I think itās all part of an act. He has a lot of followers.
Depends on the vehicle. I know a guy who owns a well respected transmission shop and he has contracts with many dealers that they outsource a lot of their transmission work to. He has a very expensive fluid exchange machines, but some vehicles itās NOT recommended. Drain and fill only.
IMO the fluid exchange problem is largely due to allowed maximum pressures in the transmission. Honda recommended drain and fill 3 times to accomplish a full fluid exchange because many fluid exchange systems used pressures high enough to damage parts inside their ATs. That would not be the case for all cars and the fluid exchange systems may have improved since 2005 when my Accord was built.
Guys, do you know why Iām having a hard time with this topic?
Because Iām getting conflicted information from dealers, as well as from regular people who own the Lexus IS.
For instance, Toyota said I need a transmission exchange at 60,000 miles.
Lexus said I donāt need a transmission exchange until 95,000 miles.
Another Lexus dealer told me the transmission is sealed and never needs to be serviced, ever, and that they wonāt service the car where it relates to the transmission, unless the transmission starts to give trouble, which is rare.
Then on an old thread from the Lexus forum Iām seeing this:
So I hope you guys understand why Iām so confused.