For what a car costs today, I demand much better than ‘average’ reliability. For half-a-year’s pay or even more, I shouldn’t have to keep taking it back to the dealer, even if it is under warranty / recall work. The first 10 years, at least, should be trouble free (not counting routine maintenance / wear items or course).
That being said, Toyota / Honda don’t seem to be the paragons of reliability they used to be. My guess is they have become so successful / profitable they aren’t “hungry” anymore. All empires have a lifecycle. If quality does deteriorate at the Japanese automakers, they’ll probably be able to coast on their reputations for a few decades, much the same as the Big 3 did before them.
There’s no money to be made selling a “basic no-nonsense well designed car” and then people like us keep it for 10 - 20 years or even longer. Remember that most of us reading and posting to a forum like this are above average in critical thinking skills. Most people are conditioned to want what they are told to want by advertisers. Therefore most people want a new car with all the latest bells and whistles every 3 years or so, and that’s what keeps the economy going.
I wanted to comment on the lawsuit thing, but I guess it would be off-topic. . . I can’t hardly turn on a television without seeing one of those “sell-us-your-structured-settlement-for-a-lump-sum-of-cash” commercials. Are there really THAT many people out there with structured settlements? And where are they all coming from? There must be, or they wouldn’t be running so many commercials. . .