Go directly to Jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200
3 Likes
But, he apparently wants to spend $200k, or likely more.
1 Like
The thing is, I know it will work the way I describe! I jut need to know if there is someone other doing that. I just didnât realize that there is only so many people on this blog. I need to find blog with millions of peopleâŠâŠ Iâm new at this do you now another blog like this with millions of members??? thx
Thank You sir
Yep, true itâs not a new, Mustang chassis with independent rear suspension. But the chassis itself is modern.
No, it wonât. No way to do this without major $$. Canât just slap '67 body panels on a 2021. Every panel will have to be modified, looking very different. Two big differences - the wheelbase and the vertical size of the body. Print out those diagrams you have posted to the same scale, trace the '67 panels, compare them to the 2021. Theyâll all be very different.
3 Likes
Iâd love to get a 67 Mustang GT500 done up that way using a new body shell so I donât have to worry about messing up a possible numbers matching original 1967. Kinda sucks the only shell available for 67 is the fastback design, but Iâd gladly use it.
Well, that got me thinking. How many notchbacks did Shelby produce? I think he only did one convertible. Majority were fastbacks.
Closest I ever got to Carroll Shelby was meeting some of his chili mix team near Willow Springs.
Now youâre wasting our time asking the same question.
3 Likes
As said beforeâŠanything is possible with enough time and money. Emphasis on money.
Personally⊠Iâd question the wisdom of taking a brand new 2020 car and making drastic changes to it for a 50+ year old car body. You do know that youâd be voiding your factory warranty, and probably chasing down a lot of âgremlinsâ over time, right?
3 Likes
@Mr_JC Enough allready ! 2 threads about the same thing and your chance of getting the answer you want here is almost Zero . Contact several Classic vehicle restorers and see if one wants to try this.
4 Likes
Ok I finally found something, but I think this is someone from Germany or Austria, but I think this is Camaro over Camaro. O and Iâm not trying to waste anyone time I that this is the blog with people who really knows about cars! This blog come up first on google!!??
Quit making duplicate posts, one thread is fine.
@cdaquila - would you please combine these?
4 Likes
Ah, come on guys, quit shining Mr_JC on. Tell him the truth, it is possible but exceeding difficult. He just has to get Bumblebee to agree to this transformation. Easy Peasy, Right?
3 Likes
Itâs like the old speed shop answer to the question: How fast can I go, the answer to which is, How much do you want to spend. If you watch a show like Bitchinâ Rides or Overhaulinâ you will see that top shelf custom car shops can do just about any kind of sheet metal work you want. With modifications you could probably fit a 1967 Camaro body to 2000 Camaro underpinnings but the body will look a bit different. 1967 Camaro: 108.1 in wheelbase, 59 in front track, 58.9 in rear track; 2000 Camaro: 101.1 in wheelbase, 60.7 in front track, 60.6 in rear track. So you would, at minimum, need to reduce the length of the '67 body by about 7 inches and widen it about 1 inch. Then there are the differences in mounting points for the suspension and sub-frame components. At the end of the day, youâre talking 6 figure (at least) in modification. Hardly cost effective, but if youâve got the money, itâs just a matter of how strong your desire is.
Thank You for your info.
No one knows nothing here, Just jokes reallyâŠ
Does that mean you know less than nothing?
5 Likes