You know, cappy, that sounds just as plausable as “HHO-enhanced gasoline” advertisements. I am with you! Let’s all rewrite the laws of physics while we are at it.
Water for fuel is a physical impossibility. HHO-enhanced gasoline for fuel is a physical possibility.
I understand that there are passionate positions on both sides.
Pure science points to the law of thermodynamics.
Car guys point to it works for me.
I have done this experiment and while I do not have a lab coat and a poket protector, my 1988 F-150 has increased mileage by 31%.
This test was not done undr controlled circumstances on a test track, and the use of the vehicle does vary, but averageing duty cycles and has shown a trend of better gas mileage.
I do not have time to go into the plate arrangements, voltages, resonance sensing arguement because it is a beautiful day and I am on vacation this week.
The point I want to make is, in this entire forum arguement there is one key point that is being overlooked.
When you fracture water into HHO you are creating a highly efficient combustion mixture. (not perfect because it is not a lab)
When this is injected or drawn into the intake air flow, it replaces a portion of the oxygen/nitrogen mix.
So, in the oxygen portion we are replacing 1 part oxygen/2parts nitrogen (roughly) with 3 parts oxygen. Akin to Nitrous Oxide being 2 parts oxygen.
THis causes higher volumetric efficiency in the engine.
I understand the thermodynmic principle of conservtion of energy, and the best I can say is that engines are extremely inefficient, both in heat loss and electrical usage. I think we are tapping some of the wasted enrgy and/or possibly the increase in volumtric effeciency help keep the torque of the motor more efficient.
I will have to give that some more thought.
Dont shoot the messenger if you dont like the message. This is not proofed, so dont pick apart diction or spelling as the reason i am wrong.