The new Dodge Dart?

“Personally, I think they would sell more Alphas if they didn’t re-badge them.”

Yes, but how many Alfas would they sell?

;-))

Fiat = Fix It Again, Tony !
Dart = Darned Alfa Romeo, Tony !

CSA

A Dart with a hemi and fine Corinthian leather appolstery …let’s pull out all the nomenclature stops.

Tommy will be so pleased - a new DODGE DART with excellent FIAT reliability…

It’s good to see that they’ve widened it…

They let people with mid life crisis name their vehicles, it seems to let people try and relive their youth.

Worker1: "Man I wish I had kept that ****** I had when I was 18. That car was badass!"
Worker2: "Yeah, but the ones that are left are either rusty or too expensive."
W1: "Wouldn’t it be cool if they brought ****** back?"
W2: "They don’t make 'em like they used to. It’d be some cheap plastic piece of $#%& if they did."
W1: "Yeah, you’re right, would be some pile of dog $#& if they did."
Car Company: "Announcing our newest car, the ******. We’re bringing the ****** back, and it’ll be better than ever."teaser pictures of said car
W1 and 2: “OMFG I WANT TO HAVE IT’S BABIES! MUST BUY!”

I drove a couple of Darts and Lancers in my youth and my memory was they were dull cars. Used some oil, too. Yes, they kept on running, but after a while I couldn’t put up with the dreary performance. At one time I had a 65 Dart GT, nice interior, sort of homely outside, and just dull performance. Give me a 65 Tempest OHC 6 anytime. I guess if Chrysler-Fiat thinks they can sell cars with the name, they should try, but I hope they are a little more lively and handle better than the old Darts.

The 1969 Dodge Dart my father bought in 1989 didn’t burn enough oil to be an issue. One time I came home while my father was out in the driveway. He wasn’t facing my direction, and that slant six ran so smooth and quiet that he didn’t even hear me pull into the driveway.

In 1996 my brother bought a new car, and was looking to get rid of that Dart. I opted to buy my grandmother’s 1984 Mercury Marquis instead. That was a huge mistake. I should have taken the Dart.

Will they bring back the Dart “Swinger”? I put the GRRRR in Swinger, Baby!! Yeah!!!

A perfect case of the “older we are, the better we were”. The same with cars. I can’t remember a straight six (except for Rambler) that wasn’t a good solid motor. IMO, the GMC had the best and "went west " recollection of the ohc version is tops… Immortality of the slant six is carried on by Dennis Weaver in the Valient.

My brother-in-law bought a Dodge Dart when he first started working for Chryco back in the 60’s. Kept that thing for years…Gave it to his son who was away in college when we was promoted to plant manager and Chryco leased him 2 new cars every other year. My nephew sold it when he graduated from college…It was approaching 500k miles by then…The engine was NEVER touched. I think it was on it’s 500th ballast resistor…And the carb had been replaced/rebuilt 2-3 times. But the engine and tranny were all original.

“I can’t remember a straight six (except for Rambler) that wasn’t a good solid motor”.
Dagosa–I had great luck with the 6 cylinder 7 bearing Rambler engine that AMC brought out in 1964. I had three AMC products with those engines ane the engines were very durable–outlasted the bodies on the cars.

“The original Dart was a tank by today’s standards.”

Wasn’t it a compact by the standards of its day?

The straight 6 has the best inherent balance.

What most people think of as a Dart ( mid '60s on up) was a compact. Earlier Darts were much larger:
The first generation were full sized cars (209" long, '60-'61). Next came the short-lived 1962, which I’d call an intermediate (we had one). From '63-'76 they were “compacts”, but at 196" that’s ‘full sized’ by today’s standards.

My '72 Duster with the slant six was very sturdy and reliable, if a bit slow. Too bad it got totaled after I sold it to a friend…

The original dart was a shortened-wheelbase full sized car. It didn’t become a compact until 3 years later when its overall length was shortened by more than a foot

My wife can’t believe that her “compact” 1965 Dodge Dart GT was 4 feet longer than her Nissan. Although a good car by 1965 standards, it would be the bottom of the barrel today. We kept ours for 13 years, and replaced just about everything over that period, except the engine and transmission, which were bullet-proof.

Just the same, the following items were replaced:

  1. Alternator (2X)
  2. Gas tank
  3. Starter
  4. Torsion bar anchor
  5. Drive shaft universals
  6. Shocks (2X)
  7. Exhaust system (3X)
  8. Battery (2X)
  9. Water pump
  10. Ignition switch
  11. Paint job
  12. Distributor shaft
  13. Windshield washers
  14. Master cylinder
  15. Turn signals
  16. Transmission shift cable
  17. Seat belts
  18. Leaking head gasket
    18 Heater fan motor
  19. Brakes and drums (2X)

The only thing I remember about Dodge Darts is that a H.S. buddy had one back in the late '60s, and it had a pushbutton automatic, with teh buttons on the dash. I always thought that made a great deal of sense, and wonder why the idea was never resurrected.

Jaguar has a rotary-dial shifter in its XF now. Looks awesome - like something out of a scifi movie, but the rotary knob retracts when the car is turned off, and then extends electronically when it’s started. I can see this getting jammed, and then you can’t put the car in gear. Of course, when has Jaguar ever cared about long-term reliability :wink:

Supposedly BMW is playing with push button shift selectors.

Really, if they ever replace the normal drive selector on automatics, at this point I’d not be surprised if they went to some sort of touch screen interface.

Give it time MB. Give it time.
The 65 Malibu I had was considered a mid-sized car in it’s day, yet it had just about as much leg room, if not less, in the back than my old Civic, despite being much longer.
Not sure how long it was, but it just barely fit into the garage where I used to live. There’s an 08 Ford Escape that resides in there now, and it still has more room than the Malibu did.

Triedag…

…I finished college with a 62 Rambler American classic. At 50k it began burning oil and had constant carb problems throughout my ownership of it. On the highway, it was a six in name only as far as performance is concerned. It was the smaller (for then)200 cu inch 6 which may explain it’s lethargy. The one saving grace that made it popular trade bait in getting one bros. Corvair Monza and the other’s Triumph, was the bed feature. I must confess, I seldom saw my car on weekends…so I know not what they did with it.
That may explain the poor erformance. Maybe it was just tuckered out when I got it on Mondays.