I’m not the expert, so I can’t say definitively why the first turbo failed. Since Bob Moore Mazda is the expert, they should have told me why they believe the turbo failed.
Once I had the info from Bob Moore I could have made an informed decision before they installed a new turbo in my CX-7, but that didn’t happen.
S. ent via the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone-------- Original message --------From: asemaster cartalk@discoursemail.com Date: 1/4/2017 10:12 PM (GMT-06:00) To: kevin.weisinger@gmail.com Subject: [Car Talk Community] [Maintenance/Repairs] Turbocharger Replacement
asemaster
January 5
kevin.weisinger:
I would take $5,000 and they can have the car.
After 3 years of payments, I paid $12,000 to pay off my loan right before all this happened. I had to spent $3,000 for the turbo repair…for a total of $15,000.
I believe $5,000 is reasonable.
That will never happen. Nor do I think it should. That just doesn’t make any sense.
Forget all the arguments here about oil change intervals and oil types and PCV systems. I’m on your side, in that I agree that the dealer did not properly address the base cause of your first turbo failure. Instead of just replacing the turbo and sending you on your way, they should have determined the root cause of the failure and recommend you repair it accordingly. This isn’t coming from any service manual, since the factory manual doesn’t state that an oil change is required upon turbo replacement. This just comes from my adherence to the principle of best practices. It’s just an opinion.
What the dealer did was a partial, incomplete repair. Now, I can tell you, as a professional in my field with nearly 30 years experience (can I really be that old?) in auto repair, that if your first turbo died because of engine sludge, the engine was done for as well. Any cleaning or flushing would only be postponing the inevitable.
The dealer should have replaced the engine as well as the turbo at the first visit. Their failure to replace the engine led to the premature failure of the turbo 12,000 miles later. So in fact all they owe you is the completion of the repair, at the price they should have quoted you at the first visit, minus any damage caused by the failure to replace the engine. In short, they owe you a turbo when you pay them for a replacement engine. A replacement engine they should have sold you the first time around.
You’re essentially asking them to buy a non-operating car for $5000. I don’t see how you get there.
The facts of the matter are that the dealer followed the published service procedure from Mazda for replacing the turbo and the turbo lasted through the warranty period. I think that’s all a judge or arbitrator is going to look at.
Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond.
In Reply To
kevin.weisinger
January 4
I would take $5,000 and they can have the car.
After 3 years of payments, I paid $12,000 to pay off my loan right before all this happened. I had to spent $3,000 for the turbo repair…for a total of $15,000.
I believe $5,000 is reasonable.
Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond.
To unsubscribe from these emails, click here.