A single used oil analysis does not a published study make.
Since my question was never directly answered, I will ask it again, but worded slightly differently: Can you find an unbiased scientific study that substantiates your claim? If so, will you please post a link?
The figures for fuel economy I’ve seen on different brands of synthetic vary somewhat but the average for typical passenger vehicles is 0.7% (percent, not miles per gallon)
7/10 of one percent is well within the margin of error of most scientific studies.
At $4/gallon, with a 30 MPG car, a 5,000 mile oil change interval, and a 0.7% increase in fuel economy, using synthetic oil could save you a whopping $4.63 in fuel costs over the course of 5,000 miles, if that claim is legitimate.
What is the difference in price between four quarts of synthetic oil and four quarts of conventional oil? I believe it’s more than $4.63, so even if you could substantiate your fuel economy claims, it would be a poor economic choice.
I’m not pushing any brand of oil - merely pointing out the facts and facts consistenty prove synthetic oil is far superior to petroleum.
Nobody is arguing about the superiority of synthetic oil, but I dispute whether the benefits are significant in all applications. If you live an a really cold climate, and don’t have a block heater, I can see there would be some benefit. If you have a turbocharged car or a car that requires synthetic oil, like a hybrid, I can see the benefit. If you have a sludge-prone car, I can see the benefit. However, none of these criteria apply to the OP, or this discussion.