Blogs Car Info Our Show Deals Mechanics Files Vehicle Donation

It's nice work if you can get it

…and Porsche is getting it!

Good for them!!

Given the starting Porsche price of about $47K to $200K plus, the average price must be about $100K so a margin of 17.3% is pretty good by car standards. Lousy by iPhone standards, they get about 69% to 200% profit on each iPhone depending on who you ask.

Yep but going back to Bruce Williams again, is it better to have $3000 on 500,000 cars?

Porsche makes a good quality product, and quality sells, especially to the right customer; i.e. one with plenty of disposable income. Reminds me, there’s a pretty good car related movie from the 60’s titled “The Yellow Rolls Royce” and in one scene the customer who’s buying it at the dealership showroom is annoyed b/c the salesman keeps talking about the technical details of the engine. "6 cylinder, 4 1/2 inch bore … blah blah blah … " … lol… The customer is more interested in which side the telephone is on. Finally the customer says “I’ll buy it”, then says to the salesman : " I don’t want to seem disinterested in your enthusiasm for the engine on this marvelous vehicle, but it is a Rolls after all? I have to presume it goes ok. " :wink:

No, I don’t think so. $3000 on mass market cars, the average car sold now is $33,600, is only 8.9% profit before taxes and roughly 6% taxes. An OK return but not a great return. Probably better than GM and Ford get right now. Porsche makes a higher margin on lower volumes because it is somewhat exclusive much like Ferrari.

Hard to get investors excited about launching a new car company with all the risk with such a low return. It’s OK for investors in old-line, established companies like Ford or GM but it won’t generate the potential upside like a Tesla. That is the real barrier to launching a brand new car company that just makes mass market cars without some real market distinction.

Assuming the company makes the same magnitude of profit in either scenario, I would choose the path with fewer units. It has less risk overall to profitability for things like; warranty expense, material scrap (E&O) due to required mid-stream changes to fix issues and so on.