Who knew mud flaps could be so controversial!
Catch this week's Car Talk? Ten years of mud flaps on his Nissan Sentra have made a skeptic out of John from Minneapolis. His thesis: mud flaps are useless salt and sand traps that cause more corrosion than they prevent. (You can
catch the call right here.)
Whaddya mean mud flaps are useless? (Flickr image by safoocat)
Ray, however, was quick to point out the perils of blinding mist kicked up by “un-flapped” tires in heavy rain--though maybe his aging vision is to blame? Tom, meanwhile, developed a little conspiracy theory that, well, only Tommy could develop.
What do you think? Would we be better off un-flapped? Are mud flaps just another gimmick from the auto-industrial-complex, or a useful addition to every car?
Share your comments right here-- and thanks!
0 •
Comments
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic 1Disagree Agree LikeWhen I bought the car, it only had one mudflap on, so my son bought me a set of new mudflaps for my birthday. I put them on and drove for a while before I noticed that one of them was starting to come off. I didn't know why, but it had started to rip where the fasteners bolted to the bracket. I tried to re-attach it as best I could.
Then, during a trip up into the mountains, I discovered the problem. At one point, we had to turn around on a narrow trail so I backed the Land Rover a little ways up the hill at the side of the trail. We pulled forward again leaving a mudflap behind. As I had backed up, the mudflap tore off when it got caught between the wheel and the hill.
I know that a responsible vehicle owner would have mudflaps, but I can't really afford to replace them every time that they get torn off so I now drive it mudflap-free.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeWish everybody did.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic 1Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic 1Disagree 1Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeEvery car I've had since the '80s could get sturdy and tight OEM flaps.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeSecond, mud flaps on semis are mandated to cover at least 50% of the tire's rear exposure. Most cars don't have enough exposed rear tire to warrant mud flaps.
Lastly, if you install mud flaps on a car that doesn't need them, expect them to rub against every speed bump you drive over. All the mud flaps I see on cars are bent backward from rubbing against speed bumps. You spend your money, you install the mud flaps, and then after a while, just as much tire is exposed as if you didn't have the flaps at all, making them a complete waste of money.
If I drove a pickup truck, I might consider installing them, but on passenger cars, they're useless. Look at the name "mud flaps." Do you drive in the mud? Do you drive off-road? I don't. If you were to ask me about water flaps, I might take a different position.
EDIT: As I was driving in the rain yesterday, it occurred to me that most SUVs probably need mudflaps, but most cars probably don't. It looked to me like most of the mist being kicked up came from SUVs and pickup trucks, not from passenger cars.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Disagree 1Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic 1Disagree Agree LikeSome folks who live in rural areas will say to move away from a spraying vehicle. Not possible in a metro area when the highways are congested and there are many cars causing spray hazard.
(for Whitey, we can call them "water flaps")
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic 1Disagree Agree 1LikeHaving driven a semi for over 35 years, I do know that a lot of spray is diverted by the flaps, as well as small stones being kicked up by the tires and the like. Sure, spray does get around the flaps, but having seen the occasional truck or trailer that is missing a flap, it would be a LOT worse without them!
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Disagree Agree Like