Regarding the guy who was wondering how best to brace for rear-end impact after he brakes suddenly in city traffic... you knuckleheads! Why entertain this question? If this guy is slamming to a halt and cringing in his rear view on a daily basis, he is clearly an aggressive driver who is following too close. This jerk has got to find a way to lower his blood pressure before he ends up crunched like a pop can in the recycle bin. If he's slamming on the brakes with regularity, he needs to allow more breathing room before he becomes the next ten car pile up statistic. Don't be that guy!
Comments
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeDude, stop sandbagging !
50 % of the time I can clearly see the fault is with the vehicle IN FRONT.
It may not be a matter of tailgating but an issue of ...sandbagging.
Just this morning -- I thought of this post--. The light turns green and nine vehicles zoom off toward thier respective work and school. I'm number six behind someone who just doesn't seem to get it that those first four trucks are now fourteen car lengths ahead, he's being passed right and left and that would be his CLUE to keep up the pace at least to the speed limit.
-- I thought of this post ---
I give ''adequate following distance'' and at least one a-hole seems to think that that is his free space to cut me off....some of them then slow down !
-- I thought of this post --
If someone is ''braking in city traffic'' therefore wondering about getting hit from behind...the problem is THEM !
This is the driver who zips into my lane one foot ahead of my front bumper and bitches at me for tailgating them...only to slam on their brakes and attempt to turn off with a turn signal AFTER they've begun the turn !
The problem is the car in front.
It's
turn signal first.
then change lanes.
then slow down to turn.
Even then I cought myself not planning ahead enough.
Turn signal with brakes and lane change one foot ahead of the car behind.
''Man that was close'' the kids said.
Which got my attention big time, the 12 year old will be driving soon.
" yes and that was the wrong way to do it." I said. "there was no accident BUT that was just asking for trouble."
she asked "so what would have been right ?"
" 2 options" I said.
" #1 ..planning ahead I should have SLOWED to a space in the traffic and,
#2...I should have missed our turn off ,waited for a space to change lanes and turn, then just gone around the block, which would have cost a whopping two more minutes, big whoop,"
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeI don't see how it could possibly be the vehicle IN FRONT's fault. Car in front of you going slow..then you need to slow down too. You are the only one who can maintain proper distance between you and the vehicle in front of you. Car in front slows down..then you slow down.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeCalifornia will write the citation to the sandbagger in front.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree 1 LikeAnd the person behind him..just pushes on the gas pedal a little to keep tailgating.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree 1 Agree Like**********************
"I don't see how it could possibly be the vehicle IN FRONT's fault."
**********************
It could be the car in front's fault if the car in front violated the tailing car's Right of Way to get in front.
Case in point: 4-lane road comes to an intersection and red light. The left lane accommodates both straight and left-turning traffic, but has no dedicated left-turn arrow. PSL is 35 MPH.
I am in the right lane, traveling the speed limit(-ish), going straight. In the left lane are one car, waiting to turn left, and another right behind it.
Just as I approach the intersection, the car waiting behind the left-turner gives up and pulls into my lane, just in front of me, with a 30+MPH speed differential.
Now, I anticipated this, and was able to stop (barely), but if I hadn't been so quick, it WOULD have been the fault of the car in front for violating my ROW...(although I admit proving this would have been tough without witnesses).
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree 1 LikeThe vehicle in front is at fault ( did you read my example where I was the fault in front ? ) when they clearly know the traffic situation and CHOOSE to create the circumstance of mere feet between their rear bumper and your front.
The vehicle behind is at fault when the clearly see the traffic situation and CHOOSE to create the circumstance of mere feet between their front bumper and your rear.
It does in fact work both ways.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeThe proper thing to do when you get the flashed high beams, or you are passed on the right, is to move a lane to the right or speed up till the high beams stop getting flashed or you stop getting passed on the right. Yes, you need to do this safely, because no on whants a Darwin Award for their actions.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree 1 Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeIf your in the left lane on a highway and NOT passing anyone and NOT keeping up with traffic in front of you then you need to move right...doesn't matter what speed you are driving. If at all possible you should ALWAYS drive as far right as possible.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree 1 Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeWhile discussing this with my wife and talking about the windshield washer discussion, her suggestion was to direct the driver's spray on to the window and the passenger spray over the roof to get the tailgater.
How about those "blue" head lights. Those things are blinding! Is there a head lamp specification for a maximum amount of lumens that they can put out?
You guys are great!
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeMikeInNH February 9 Report
50 % of the time I can clearly see the fault is with the vehicle IN FRONT.
I don't see how it could possibly be the vehicle IN FRONT's fault. Car in front of you going slow..then you need to slow down too. You are the only one who can maintain proper distance between you and the vehicle in front of you. Car in front slows down..then you slow down.
#
MikeInNH February 21 Report
If your in the left lane on a highway and NOT passing anyone and NOT keeping up with traffic in front of you then you need to move right...doesn't matter what speed you are driving. If at all possible you should ALWAYS drive as far right as possible.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree 1 LikeOthers made valid points about keeping right and I'll go one further. If you're in the left lane and barely passing the cars to the right, you don't belong there. Imagine the other cars are parked - 0 mph - then estimate how fast you're going in relation to them...it's often not more than 1-2 mph faster. It's not enough to justify blocking passing lanes, please be considerate and move over. Likewise, if there's open road in front of you, and cars behind you, no matter how fast you're going, please move over, it's not your job to be a pace setter and you're encouraging tailgating and passing on the right.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree 1 Agree LikeIt's not your job to be a pace setter.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like 1MikeInNH February 9 Report
50 % of the time I can clearly see the fault is with the vehicle IN FRONT.
Go back and re-read the posts....I'm NOT the one who said the person in front was at at fault...I quoted what Ken said...and then argued AGAINST it.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like