Maybe I can clear up a few things for the exasperated that seem to think I’m just trying to annoy you , and especially for those that post statements as if in response to someone trying to change you. From my previous development of MM systems I was approached and given the proposition to develop a system, the market already exists, the technology is lagging, as described briefly by TwinTurbo(thanks again) earlier. The clarity here might come when one considers the potential markets. It’s not for you. And it’s just a coincidence that I have been a test subject for this, but things have a funny way of working out that way.
Now pretend you are a fleet manager of say10,000 gov’t vehicles, small cars and trucks. (Can you guess how many the US gov’t alone has? How about the rest of the world?) As noted, not only can MM lead to savings in not throwing away perfectly good oil, which costs a lot to dispose of, and the time lost while the vehicle is in the shop, the other non-obvious benefit is that if somebody (like I’m sure you think I am) drives one of the cars in your fleet on the way back from the shop and does something to degrade the oil, you couldn’t possibly know about it, and the festering problem will not be addressed for ???K miles, if it gets that far, this happens in all PM type programs, so MM programs turn out to be at least as good as a PM system. Since there was some math in earlier posts, lets do some here: A typical set of data that I have seen for this type of market shows that the cars go about 300-350k(about 4-5 years is typical) before they get rid of them for scrap price, almost always for things not related to the engine, usually something like body/glass damage, bad tranny, worn interior, failed electrical systems… So if those 10,000 cars had an oil change every 5000 miles that would be about 65 oil changes per car, that’s 650,000 oil changes, and disposals, and days the car is in the shop in maybe 5 years. Say it’s $20 to change/dispose of the oil, throw in some lost time cost. - that’s $13 million dollars, to change the oil. Now we all know that non-stressed oil could go 10k miles with no problems, but we just change sooner, as cheap insurance. What if it could go 15k? That’s a savings of 66% or nearly $9 million dollars, and you saved the engines that would have failed due to premature oil degradation that the PM programs could never catch. Now sure, some of these 10000 govt cars may not go to the scrap heap with oil pans as clean as yours, but they are going to the scrap heap(some are bought from the scrap dealer because they still work, but the gov’t only gets scrap price), would you be happy to chip in your share for an extra $9 million in taxes to have cars that are sold for scrap, but the inside of the engine will be very clean? What if half of the cars made it to 20K miles or 25k/change and still made their 325k mile goal? Would the extra good feeling of knowing those cars had more frequent oil changes make you vote for higher taxes? I can see the political ad now - “It’s cheap insurance”
I think an earlier poster alluded to oil and oil changing as a religious thing for many here, and for those that need something to waste time on a Saturday - Sorry to bother you guys, I’m in it for the money.