“What possible PROOF to you have in making a statement like that??? How were they even remotely involved…”
I guess you didn’t follow the confirmation of Elena Kagan. Harvard’s position on gays in the military during her tenure has been in all the papers.
“SECOND…How is that a LIBERAL AGENDA”
I never said it was. See my earlier post, reproduced below. No need to attribute to me positions which I do not hold.
“…THIRD…Border line bigotry…if NOT over the line”
I’m unclear on where you’re going with that, or even what you’re talking about.
“…This is the 20th century…What does is matter to you what someones sexual orientation is…As a Vietnam Vet…I didn’t care if the guy next to me was gay or straight…All I cared about was would he protect me and the rest of the platoon.”
Well, good for you. To my mind that makes you a right thinking person.
On the other hand, last time I checked, this is NOT the 20th century.
Again, you’re a little unclear. And again, you’re the one who has just recently introduced the word “liberal” into our exchange.
“I’ve NEVER heard of any decent university that has an AGENDA besides teaching.”
So it would be fair to say you don’t consider Harvard a decent university? Until recently, at least, it had the agenda of changing U.S. Govt. policies on homosexuals in the military.
Catholic University, Notre Dame, Villanova, Georgetown, United States Military Academy, none of them decent universities in your view?