When buying a car you want to keep a long time, the main cosiderations will be how long the body lasts without rusting out, and the parts availability. In addition, the life expextancies of the key components is important.
For lowest “life cylce cost”, an accounting and technical term, Toyotas, Hondas, Mazdas, and now Hyundais stand out for their long life, reliability and good parts supply. I friend of mine has a 13 year old Jaguar, and the dealer refuses to even try to order a part. The local Chrysler dealer will not stock any part for cars older than 10 years.
Agree that paying more for a Toyota than a Saturn Astra makes a great deal of sense. The Astra was designed by GM’s Opel of Germany (now in bankruptcy, but being sold to Magna International, a parts maker) and built in Belgium, sold by Saturn which has been bought by Roger Penske. The prospect of getting parts for this car 15 years from now are very slim. People who bought Daewoo cars can testify.
Ford and Chevy pickups are not the world’s best vehicles, but many 30 year old ones are still running around. The secret is cheap and readily available parts.
If we look at Volkswagens in this light we find: basic design flaws, shorter lived and more costly parts, uncertain future parts availability at reasonable prices (poor aftermarket), needlessly complex and unreliable electronics, maintenance schedules that almost certainly doom the transmission and engine to a shorter life.
Comparing this with Hyundai, we get better reliability, design for North American market use, cheaper and longer lived parts, and very good basic warranty, as well as better trained and less arrogant dealers. Volkswagens probably have better SEATS and slightly better BODIES, than Hyundais.