This kind of discussion just drives me nuts. The rice thing is so bogus and just shows where the feds with the ramp meters, car pool lanes, etc. I would regularly drive the I35W or E section in Minneapolis over the past 30 years. Congestion was no problem until the downtown decided to supersize their attractions and office buildings instead of allowing natural development in the suburbs. Downtown/developers wanted the tax money and commerce from all the huge office buildings. Then came gridlock because of it. Then a third lane was added and just before it was made a car pool lane, everything was fine again. Then it became a car pool lane and gridlock in the rest of it again. With a bus strike, everything was back to normal. Then buses are back and gridlock again.
Ramps were intended to allow cars and buses to get up to speed but with the ramp meters, you sit in line for ten minutes and then everyone crawls into the driving lane backing up traffic even more. Actually one of the best ways believe it or not is for each car to allow about 5 car lengths in front of them to avoid the slinky effect. Try it sometime-it really works. Might drive aggressive people a little nuts but with 5 car lengths, you don’t have to brake or slow down usually.
To me the idea is unimpeded travel. If you can travel at 70 mph, you limit the time on the road, and thereby increase total road capacity. Reduce the speed and reduce capacity. A dumb curve in the road, a shovel, patrol car, bus crawling up to speed, two highways converging and so on, slows traffic and reduces total capacity.
So take a hard look at inner city development and who is benefitting, wasted money on car pool lanes, large buses slowing the traffic down, and poor design causing roadway restrictions, plus an interchange every block to satisfy development, and thats the cause of congestion. Forget the rice experiments.