Regarding my earlier comment about those old Cressidas being more durable than Tauruses, please allow me to clarify.
Although I did have some initial electronic glitches with the Taurus, it proved to be a very reliable and durable car for the 6 years that I owned it. In fact, despite the reputation for early failure of their transmissions, my experience regarding the trans of my Taurus was a very positive one:
As I described in another thread a few months ago, I couldnât avoid driving over a load of rebars that had been dropped by a truck in front of me on the highway. I initially assumed that the car had sustained no damage, however, about 15 miles later, as I exited the highway, the transmission did a VERY hard downshift, which was not at all characteristic of the way that it operated.
Because I was only ~1/2 mile from home at that point, I opted to keep driving until I was able to get to my own driveway. As soon as I got out of the car, I saw a telltale trail of red fluid on the ground, and a small puddle of the same red fluid on the ground underneath the car. Gulp! Not good!
I checked the dipstick, and it showed no fluid on the stick. The puddle on the ground did not get any bigger, so apparently the trans lost the last pint of so of its fluid as I drove into my driveway.
With fear and trepidation, I had the car towed to the Ford dealership, and they simply replaced the trans pan and gasket, refilled it with fluid, and sent me on my way after I paid the bill.
Andâbelieve it or notâthat transmission continued to operate normally for the remaining 3 years that I owned the car. Even though I had essentially run the transmission dry, somehow it had survived that torture.
Other than needing to replace a couple of sensors when the car was a few months old, I never had any other electronic issues with it, and I had no mechanical problems with it.
As to the Cressida, I went by my neighborâs claims that the car was âbulletproofâ. Whether it really was that reliable or durable, I canât say.