The Citroen is ugly-cute, this thing is ugly-ugly.
BTW, I believe it would take a lot more than aerodynamics (even if done correctly) to obtain that kind of mileage.
Someone in a neighboring town has one of those old 60s era Citroens and I always thought it was the ugliest car within a 50 mile radius until the link to this rolling abortion was posted.
Since I see no tailpipes protruding at the back, I wonder if CO leakage into the cabin is affecting his judgement about those claimed figures.
Actually I do make it point to refer to the H2 as a glorified suburban whenever someone makes a reference to one in conversation.
YOU may think so…but the THOUSANDS of people who buy the H2 obviously DON’T.
That car is aerodynammically backward. Look at the sunrace cars, they are the apex of efficiency.
I got at most 88 mpg on a Honda… XL200 that is get real getting 95. Not true at all.