I don’t think the difference between year and mileage is enough to be significant between the two. However, two other things come to mind. One, Subaru had some problems with the head gaskets on certain engines in the late-90’s through early-00’s and so you should definitely do some research to make sure you’re not getting one of those (or at least one that’s been fixed with the “improved head gaskets”). The other thing is the timing belt-- if the 130k one has had it done recently but the 94k one hasn’t, that’s a several hundred dollar point in its favor.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years vs. miles on a car | 0 | 237 | April 27, 2010 | |
| Subaru buyer needs help | 15 | 1410 | April 13, 2010 | |
| Considering a 2000 Subaru Outback | 9 | 1107 | July 30, 2012 | |
| Used car shopping: age vs. mileage | 9 | 10507 | December 10, 2010 | |
| Buy used or old? | 7 | 751 | October 17, 2008 |