On my daily commute I see no less than ten drivers fiddling with their cell phones in some way. It slows me down, creates unexpected hazards, and generally irks me. (Not to mention it's illegal where I live)
Browsing the web led me to a simplistic and inexpensive solution... Cell Phone Jammers!
I purchased myself a cellphone jammer, played with it a bit to maximize the effective range, installed it in my vehicle, and suddenly I don't see so many people fiddling with their phones anymore.
For about $30 I have an effective range of up to 100 feet of jamming.
It's not an eloquent solution by any means, but it certainly gets the job done!
Comments
I also wonder whether its actually safer or not: person on cell phone 100 ft away loses call...by the time I close the 100 ft. they are now not talking into the phone but fiddling with it instead to see why they lost the call. This is worse.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeActually, jamming the signal may increase the hazard, IMHO.
Imagine Joe Cellphone or Jill Cellphone is engaged in conversation while driving, and then that conversation suddenly is cut off by your jamming of the signal. Because they do not know why they lost their signal, they are likely to take their attention away from their driving tasks in order to try to connect again, and again, and again.
Ergo--your solution may actually result in even less attention to their driving tasks than if you had just gritted your teeth and ignored them.
I share your frustration and annoyance with cell phone scofflaws.
However, I don't think that your solution is an elegant one, and because it does not talk to me, I also doubt that your solution is "eloquent".
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Likehttp://www.ehow.com/list_6468920_fcc-rules-cell-phone-jamming.html
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeThough I notice they certainly have no problem SELLING these devices in this country. Or rather, I obtained one easily enough...
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeSimilarly, it's legal to buy and own a gun, but it's not legal to shoot someone with it.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree LikeWhen you go through any sort of FCC licensing, you learn a lot about why the FCC is so conservative. When you're emitting RF, the law of unintended consequences is in full effect.
In this case, you're not only dropping the calls of your fellow drivers. You're also dropping calls for every pedestrian, house, office, and business you drive past. You also probably drive by a lot of cell towers every day without realizing it. And depending on conditions, that advertised 100 feet could be 10 feet, or it could be half a mile.
Even if you magically limited the interference to cars, you're also killing passengers' calls and emergency systems like OnStar.
Besides (and this may be anathema here), I think there are some legit reasons to make a call while you're driving -- reporting a drunk driver, or calling 911 in a situation where you don't feel safe stopping.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
Off Topic Disagree Agree Like