# Volvo will phase-out gas-powered vehicles in a few years

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/volvo-will-phase-out-gas-powered-vehicles-in-a-few-years/105603>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Tags:** volvo\
**Created:** [July 5, 2017, 11:36am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/volvo-will-phase-out-gas-powered-vehicles-in-a-few-years/105603 "2017-07-05T11:36:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/30_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2017, 9:50pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/volvo-will-phase-out-gas-powered-vehicles-in-a-few-years/105603/13 "2017-07-05T21:50:02Z")

</div>

> [@the\_same\_mountainbik](#):
>
> Whoever write the article’s headline doesn’t appear to have read the article. Amazing, but true!

You are correct, but I think it is interesting to note that EVERY site that published–and amplified-- Volvo’s press release posted an essentially similar headline. That includes **_Fortune_** magazine, which calls itself “The Capitalist Tool”.

It seems that everyone–including me–was guilty of not reading the full details of Volvo’s press release.  
Could that massive amount of miscommunication be the result of poor English usage in the original press release, as a result of Volvo’s Chinese ownership?  
Quien sabe?

😕

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.cartalk.com/t/volvo-will-phase-out-gas-powered-vehicles-in-a-few-years/105603)._