George, for many years on this board, I read every imaginable personal opinion on oil type and oil changes. And, everyone who stated a personal opinion always had a reason for that personal opinion. And, every reason for a personal opinion was actually just a personal guess as to what was appropriate to do.
So much so that it is probably a waste of time to even ask here which type of oil to use, and how long to go between changes.
There were even always the usual suspects who to this day insist if you really care for your car, you will change that oil every 3,000 miles. Without regard to much improved oils since we stopped living in caves. [/sarcasm]
I got tired of that random decision making process, and chose to change my Mobil-1 EP at 8800 miles and send it out for test.
Blackstone does a really good job of testing. They test for overall oil condition; and acid protection, I think you call it, and test for every sort of contamination.
They can tell you if your oil is contaminated by coolant; dust from air filter leaks; combustion by-products; bearing or other engine wear; and probably other stuff I have forgotten.
And, they let you know if your oil condition is within usable ranges on every parameter.
My oil at 8800 miles had a lot of use left in it, in every characteristic. Mathematically, it looked as if it would be good to 11,000 miles, though I have chosen to replace at around 8,000 miles or one year of driving in Mexico if less than 8,000 miles.
How many of you would go 8,800 miles with dino oil? Volunteers?
Now, let us look at that link you supplied. Another personal opinion apparently based on guessing. He says, wal, goshie darn, all oil gets contaminated, and synthetic gets contaminated at the same rate as regular oil. So, better to use regular dino and change it more often.
Oh, really? That is based on the false premise that contamination is a killer on synthetic oil. (At this point, I am not even sure contamination is the killer on dino oil. It may be, but I don’t have data to show that.) Based not on someone’s guess, but my own oil test, I am sure contamination is not a killer for synthetic oil on a good motor in long distance driving. So, he is bringing up a straw man and then making a recommendation based on that.
Not that I mind people making their decisions on oil usage and changes, based on guessing. I am enough of a libertarian I wouldn’t have it any other way. The problem is when that personal opinion rises to the level of a recommendation for people who are trying to learn! So, tell us why and when you change your oil and which type you use. Readers can look through the wild guesses and pick one that suits them, or that they want to try.
But, recommendations of any real value can only come from the true experts, who happen to be the lab that tests your oil. Or, of course, the engineers who designed the car in the first place, which usually means change it a lot less than most people here do.
Interestingly, he actually agrees with the various advantages of synthetic oil for all motors, then based on the straw man of contamination recommends against the obvious correct choice.
I have noticed that many newer cars are now recommending synthetic oil. Their usual reason is the new motors work to different tolerances. Maybe so; maybe not. I must wonder if that recommendation is also based on an attempt to avoid early breakdown when people don’t change their oil often enough. Just in case.