# Replace Tires at 18K miles?

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301>\
**Category:** Maintenance/Repairs\
**Tags:** sienna, toyota\
**Created:** [October 31, 2016, 1:46pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301 "2016-10-31T13:46:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KitchenQueen67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f14d63/32.png) [@KitchenQueen67](https://community.cartalk.com/u/KitchenQueen67)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 1:46pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/1 "2016-10-31T13:46:56Z")

</div>

I purchased a 2015 Toyota Sienna in Feb 2016. I was told at the 15K mile checkup that I would need to replace the tires! Michelin Primacy MXV-4 P235/60R17 which are rated for 60K miles. These are OEM and I am more than annoyed that I am being told I need to buy new tires, when these haven’t reached 1/4 of their expectancy. Currently Michielin is willing to pay 30% of the cost of new tires, but I am not willing to pay the rest. Handling is squirrely on wet roads covered with leaves, no hope of driving in the snow. Anyone else have this problem? Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mustangman](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/mustangman/32/44130_2.png) [@Mustangman](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mustangman)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 1:58pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/2 "2016-10-31T13:58:14Z")

</div>

That 60,000 rating is not an iron-clad fact it depends drastically on how the previous owner drove so , Yes, you could very well need new tires. While this is abnormal wear on tires of this quality, it can and does happen.

You can check then yourself by simply looking at the tread.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/original/2X/7/78ce00cd5002435abe53b97ca55a254f89f1e67f.jpg)

Those tread bars going across the tread face are known as “wear bars”. If they are the same height as the tread itself at any point. it is time to replace the tires. If the tire wear is un-even across the face, you should have the alignment and tire pressures checked as well. Both can prematurely wear out tires.

Your own experience driving on these tires screams “Replace Me” so I’d take that 30% cost share on a new set of Michelins. They likely will provide you with many miles of service if you keep the car aligned and the pressures set correctly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOLVO-V70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/8e8cbc/32.png) [@VOLVO-V70](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VOLVO-V70)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 2:06pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/3 "2016-10-31T14:06:44Z")

</div>

You have answered your own question. The tires do not perform well on slick roads and no chance on snow. Replace them, the cost of tires will be less than your deductible if you slide into a tree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveCBT](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/stevecbt/32/3192_2.png) [@SteveCBT](https://community.cartalk.com/u/SteveCBT)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 2:20pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/4 "2016-10-31T14:20:52Z")

</div>

My daughters Rav4 had Yokomaha tires on it and some of the tread wear bars were starting to show @ 15,000 miles. We replaced them with Michelins from Costco that have a mileage warranty. Take the 30% and get new tires. Your other option is to keep running on the tires you admit are squirrely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KitchenQueen67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f14d63/32.png) [@KitchenQueen67](https://community.cartalk.com/u/KitchenQueen67)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 2:48pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/5 "2016-10-31T14:48:50Z")

</div>

I’m the only owner, I bought this brand new from the dealer, and I had the tires rotated every 5K miles, and the alignment is fine. I will be using snow tires for the winter, but I will not willingly put another set of Michelin tires on this van. I took it to my local tire shop for the rotation & pressure checks, and they were shocked at how little tread is left on the tires, they had to write out a report with the tire depth for the warranty department at Michelin for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mustangman](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/mustangman/32/44130_2.png) [@Mustangman](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mustangman)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 2:52pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/6 "2016-10-31T14:52:48Z")

</div>

Certainly that is your choice. I generally like Michelin tires but they don’t work well on some vehicles. My wife’s Saab for example. OEM Michelins that got very noisy in-between rotations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/7 "2016-10-31T15:22:23Z")

</div>

> [@KitchenQueen67](#):
>
> I am not willing to pay the rest

It would seem to me that you have no choice other than to get a different brand elsewhere, which is what I’d do. [www.tirerack.com](http://www.tirerack.com) has a good consumer review section.

If the wear isn’t as clean and even as that shown in Mustang’s photo, an alignment may be in order too. You’ll find that the warranty won’t cover the alignment, so just go elsewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whitey](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/whitey/32/24680_2.png) [@Whitey](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Whitey)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 4:39pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/8 "2016-10-31T16:39:31Z")

</div>

> [@KitchenQueen67](#):
>
> Currently Michielin is willing to pay 30% of the cost of new tires, but I am not willing to pay the rest.

You don’t have to pay 70% of the cost of replacement tires. Your other choice is to buy them elsewhere and pay 100% of the cost of replacement.

You seem to be willing to cut off your nose to spite your face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KitchenQueen67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f14d63/32.png) [@KitchenQueen67](https://community.cartalk.com/u/KitchenQueen67)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 4:54pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/9 "2016-10-31T16:54:48Z")

</div>

I don’t appreciate your snarkiness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whitey](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/whitey/32/24680_2.png) [@Whitey](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Whitey)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 5:31pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/10 "2016-10-31T17:31:48Z")

</div>

I don’t think I was being snarky, at least not intentionally. Your rejection of Michelin’s offer seemed rather blunt, so I figured I’d be just as blunt in my assessment of the situation.

You bought a used car with used tires. Now that the tires need replaced, you were offered a 30% discount on replacement tires, based either on mileage or measured tread depth.

Since you can’t say how the previous owner treated those tires, that offer seems both reasonable and fair, and if you think it is unfair, you can ether attempt to negotiate by offering a counter offer, or pay 100% of the replacement cost elsewhere. Detached from emotion, the choice seems obvious to me. I’d try to bargain the price down from 70% to 60%, but either way, I’d take advantage of the discount.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon86613489](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@anon86613489](https://community.cartalk.com/u/anon86613489)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 5:59pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/11 "2016-10-31T17:59:16Z")

</div>

Ehh, Whitey

> [@KitchenQueen67](#):
>
> I’m the only owner, I bought this brand new from the dealer, and I had the tires rotated every 5K miles

Just mentioning it.😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bing](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bing/32/4619_2.png) [@bing](https://community.cartalk.com/u/bing)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 6:01pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/12 "2016-10-31T18:01:00Z")

</div>

I think it was a new car. I’ve had three sets of those tires though and had no problem with wear, snow, or rain in Minnesota. They were a nice quiet tire and have them on our Acura now. Seems to me we replaced them at about 50,000 with about 3 or 4/32 on them yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whitey](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/whitey/32/24680_2.png) [@Whitey](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Whitey)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 6:06pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/13 "2016-10-31T18:06:44Z")

</div>

Ah, I missed that in the follow-up comment. That changes things a little, but not much. I’d be disappointed too, but left with those options, unless I could find tires that were less expensive at full price than tires discounted by 30%, I’d go with the discount.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtsanders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@jtsanders](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jtsanders)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 6:54pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/14 "2016-10-31T18:54:03Z")

</div>

Low mileage could be the result of how you drive your van. I don’t mean hot rodding, but a lot of stop and go with a lot of turns.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KitchenQueen67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f14d63/32.png) [@KitchenQueen67](https://community.cartalk.com/u/KitchenQueen67)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 7:03pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/15 "2016-10-31T19:03:59Z")

</div>

I thought of that, but I bought the Toyota to replace my 2002 Honda Ody, at 286K miles, it wasn’t going to last another year and my driving pattern hasn’t changed, just the vehicle. In looking at other forums regarding Michelin tires, it seems that you either love them or hate them, and that the company doesn’t stand by it’s warranty, the 30% is pretty standard for them with tires that don’t last. I was hoping to hear how others who have had this same issue were able to resolve it. I think it’s unfair for me to have to pay 70% for new tires, since these should be covered under warranty. I am still waiting to hear back from Toyota…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![always\_fixing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/71e660/32.png) [@always\_fixing](https://community.cartalk.com/u/always_fixing)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 7:15pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/16 "2016-10-31T19:15:40Z")

</div>

> [@KitchenQueen67](#):
>
> I purchased a 2015 Toyota Sienna in Feb 2016. I was told at the 15K mile checkup that I would need to replace the tires! Michelin Primacy MXV-4 P235/60R17 which are rated for 60K miles. These are OEM and I am more than annoyed that I am being told I need to buy new tires, when these haven’t reached 1/4 of their expectancy. Currently Michielin is willing to pay 30% of the cost of new tires, but I am not willing to pay the rest. Handling is squirrely on wet roads covered with leaves, no hope of driving in the snow. Anyone else have this problem? Thanks!

How on earth did they come up with 30%? Shouldn’t it be more like 75% on comparable tires of the similar price if they wore evenly and you had them rotated according to Michelin’s guidelines?

[http://www.michelinman.com/content/dam/master/Michelin/pdf/Owners\_Manual\_Post\_Promise\_Plan.pdf](http://www.michelinman.com/content/dam/master/Michelin/pdf/Owners_Manual_Post_Promise_Plan.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KitchenQueen67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f14d63/32.png) [@KitchenQueen67](https://community.cartalk.com/u/KitchenQueen67)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 7:43pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/17 "2016-10-31T19:43:35Z")

</div>

Thanks, that is my point exactly! but, in this warranty pamphlet, it states:  
30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee:1  
We’re confident you’ll love your new MICHELIN **replacement tires**. So  
confident, in fact, that we back your purchase with a 30-Day Satisfaction  
Guarantee. If you’re not 100% satisfied with your new tires, just bring the  
tires and original sales receipt back to the place where you bought the  
tires within 30 days of your purchase and we will gladly exchange them  
for a new set of tires of equal or lesser value.  
**Original Equipment tires not**  **included**. \_

And these are the lousy tires that came with the van. I am going to continue to argue the point that they should be replacing my tires, and still waiting to hear back from Toyota dealer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOLVO-V70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/8e8cbc/32.png) [@VOLVO-V70](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VOLVO-V70)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 7:53pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/18 "2016-10-31T19:53:56Z")

</div>

You can argue all you want but it is probably a waste of time. Tire warranties on new cars are with tire company not the builder of the vehicle. It is just a fact of life that some tires will wear different due to driving patterns.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon86613489](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@anon86613489](https://community.cartalk.com/u/anon86613489)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 7:55pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/19 "2016-10-31T19:55:24Z")

</div>

And I agree with You, Whitey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Triedaq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/65b543/32.png) [@Triedaq](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Triedaq)\
**Post date:** [October 31, 2016, 9:57pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301/20 "2016-10-31T21:57:38Z")

</div>

I have a 2011 Sienna which is the same design as the OP’s Sienna. I purchased mine new and the original Firestone tires had to be replaced at 35,000. I put on Michelin tires and only got about 35,000 from the Michelin. I bought another set of Michelin which my independent tire dealer told me were designed for a minivan. I hope this second set of Michelin lasts longer. I keep the tires properly inflated and I do the tire rotation. I got 60,000 on the Goodyear tires that came with my 2006 Uplander. My suspicion is that Toyota put a.size tire on the Sienna that is too small to carry the load.

[Next page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/replace-tires-at-18k-miles/96301.md?page=2)
