# Recalls, wow! **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 28, 2025, 10:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810 "2025-06-28T22:26:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\ **Post date:** [June 28, 2025, 10:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/1 "2025-06-28T22:26:14Z")
# GM recalls more than 62,000 top-selling vehicles, owners advised to park outside > **[GM recalls more than 62,000 top-selling vehicles, owners advised to park outside](https://local12.com/news/nation-world/general-motors-gm-recall-recalls-recalling-recalled-silverado-hd-short-circuit-overheat-brake-pressure-sensor-assembly-mechanical-dangerous-products-consumer-alerts-repair-dealership-repairs-national-highway-traffic-safety-administration-report-nhtsa?-fbpost)** > > Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed out by July 28. # Ford Issues ‘Do Not Drive’ Warning as 1.3 Million Vehicles Recalled > **[Ford Issues 'Do Not Drive' Warning as 1.3 Million Vehicles Recalled](https://autos.yahoo.com/ford-issues-not-drive-warning-072736111.html)** > > Ford is recalling more than 1.3 million vehicles across the United States, citing serious mechanical and software issues that could lead to accidents, including one defect severe enough to trigger an urgent “Do Not Drive” order. In filings with the... ---
**Author:** ![jtsanders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@jtsanders](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jtsanders)\ **Post date:** [June 28, 2025, 11:37pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/2 "2025-06-28T23:37:58Z")
Ford wins. Almost every vehicle line is affected. Only the commercial HD pickups for Chevy have the problem. ---
**Author:** ![db4690](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/db4690/32/2583_2.png) [@db4690](https://community.cartalk.com/u/db4690)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 1:04am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/3 "2025-06-29T01:04:00Z")
The Ford recall is especially pathetic, imo ---
**Author:** ![bing](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bing/32/4619_2.png) [@bing](https://community.cartalk.com/u/bing)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 2:06am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/4 "2025-06-29T02:06:43Z")
We have talked about the issue of being able to open doors with a mechanical latch before. Not electrical, not software, but a handle. Fire, water, crash, etc. need to be able to open all doors. ---
**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/30_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 12:05pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/5 "2025-06-29T12:05:25Z")
Let’s not forget about Honda’s large recall for brake pedals that “can become loose”. ![:eek:](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/original/3X/2/0/2016e752503d49f7f839b4241c8ce61f71b278b5.gif) [https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a65175012/honda-pilot-acura-tlx-mdx-brake-pedal-recall/](https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a65175012/honda-pilot-acura-tlx-mdx-brake-pedal-recall/) > [@bing](#): > > We have talked about the issue of being able to open doors with a mechanical latch before. Not electrical, not software, but a handle. I would have thought that every mfr whose vehicles have an electronic door latch would also provide a mechanical backup, but I guess I was wrong. My NX has electronic door latches that you push in order to open the door (form follows function, as Louis Sullivan preached), but pulling on that same latch will unlock the door mechanically. ---
**Author:** ![Nevada\_545](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/nevada_545/32/41232_2.png) [@Nevada\_545](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Nevada_545)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 7:38pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/6 "2025-06-29T19:38:03Z")
> [@VDCdriver](#): > > I would have thought that every mfr whose vehicles have an electronic door latch would also provide a mechanical backup, but I guess I was wrong. Ford vehicles have mechanical door release handles: > " If the driver or front passenger exit the front doors using the mechanical inside release handles, the doors may remain locked when they are re-closed." The problem is after the driver and passenger exit the vehicle, they might not be able to re-enter to retrieve a passenger. A software update will correct the problem. ---
**Author:** ![Nevada\_545](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/nevada_545/32/41232_2.png) [@Nevada\_545](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Nevada_545)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 8:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/7 "2025-06-29T20:26:30Z")
> [@jtsanders](#): > > Ford wins. Almost every vehicle line is affected. Ford isn’t the only manufacture with back-up camera malfunctions, during the last two months 6 other manufactures have issued recalls for backup camera problems. Chrysler (Ram) 235,640 trucks: [RCLRPT-25V330-9935.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCLRPT-25V330-9935.pdf) Kia, 11,327 vehicles: [RCLRPT-25V426-6171.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCLRPT-25V426-6171.pdf) Mitsubishi, 198,940 vehicles: [RCLRPT-25V369-0728.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCLRPT-25V369-0728.pdf) Nissan, 79,755 vehicles [RCLRPT-25V324-2868.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCLRPT-25V324-2868.pdf) Volkswagen, 171.381 vehicles: [RCAK-25V334-5247.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCAK-25V334-5247.pdf) Volvo, 413,151 vehicles: [RCLRPT-25V282-3568.PDF](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2025/RCLRPT-25V282-3568.PDF) From last year, Lexus 18,616 vehicles: [RCMN-24V124-0038.pdf](https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2024/RCMN-24V124-0038.pdf) ---
**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 10:52pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/8 "2025-06-29T22:52:46Z")
> [@Nevada\_545](#): > > back-up camera malfunction I do not know about malfunction, but 2017 rav 4 backup camera pretty worthless. Brightness all the way up but 90% of the time I cannot see enough due to glare on the screen. Wish it had the you are going to back into something beeper. ---
**Author:** ![Nevada\_545](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/nevada_545/32/41232_2.png) [@Nevada\_545](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Nevada_545)\ **Post date:** [June 29, 2025, 11:46pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/recalls-wow/200810/9 "2025-06-29T23:46:47Z")
> [@Barkydog](#): > > I do not know about malfunction You posted the Yahoo article link, this is what it shows: > Ford also recently recalled nearly 1.1 million vehicles due to a rearview camera software defect that can cause the image to freeze or fail completely, raising the risk of backing accidents.