# RE the fan belt puzzler

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847>\
**Category:** The Show\
**Created:** [February 8, 2012, 9:35am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847 "2012-02-08T09:35:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mechaniker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/13edae/32.png) [@Mechaniker](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mechaniker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 9:35am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/1 "2012-02-08T09:35:04Z")

</div>

The puzzler got me thinking about flat fan belts. They are used today where ever ultra high speed and low friction are required. (They are the blades in bandsaws, for example.)

Ever wonder about the contour of the pulley face, and what keeps the flat belt centered on the pulley?

For the curious, the answer is [here](http://woodgears.ca/bandsaw/crowned_pulleys.html).

BTW, the story Click & Clack described actually occurred in WWII. The name of the German soldier who came up with the idea, and whose name is forever associated with the technique for reducing fan belt wear, was Obergefreiter Moe B. Usse. He was later _stripped_ of his awards after caught carrying gasoline in a Klein bottle (which he bought at M. C. Escher und Söhne).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 10:52pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/2 "2012-02-08T22:52:03Z")

</div>

Low friction? Friction is GOOD when using belts. Perhaps you meant high flexibility (low internal friction)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mechaniker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/13edae/32.png) [@Mechaniker](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mechaniker)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 11:14am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/3 "2012-02-09T11:14:32Z")

</div>

I meant high efficiency, i.e., little to no loss in power conduction. V-belts have higher internal friction (they are thicker and stiffer).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2012, 11:25pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/4 "2012-02-09T23:25:57Z")

</div>

Internal friction. That’s what I figured you meant. It didn’t come out clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EllyEllis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f14d63/32.png) [@EllyEllis](https://community.cartalk.com/u/EllyEllis)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 7:47am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/5 "2012-02-10T07:47:45Z")

</div>

```
      "" Ever wonder about the contour of the pulley face, and what keeps the flat belt centered on the pulley?""

```

Honestly, I never have wondered!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mechaniker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/13edae/32.png) [@Mechaniker](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mechaniker)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2012, 1:38pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/6 "2012-02-10T13:38:01Z")

</div>

Some of us are more curious than others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 12:56am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/7 "2012-02-11T00:56:06Z")

</div>

I wonder about it, and looked it up, many years ago. So far back I don’t even remember.

I have an enquiring mind…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EllyEllis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f14d63/32.png) [@EllyEllis](https://community.cartalk.com/u/EllyEllis)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 6:08am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/8 "2012-02-11T06:08:25Z")

</div>

Monkeys are curious too. JUST KIDDING!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MBStever](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f04885/32.png) [@MBStever](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MBStever)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 8:33pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/9 "2012-02-11T20:33:36Z")

</div>

Give me a break: Moe B. Usse? Hummm…Mobius?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wavyonwheels](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/wavyonwheels/32/17969_2.png) [@wavyonwheels](https://community.cartalk.com/u/wavyonwheels)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 8:38pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/10 "2012-02-11T20:38:03Z")

</div>

I am hoping Ober made it past the front lines before they discovered a twist in the belt would make it wear faster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nickpang](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a587f6/32.png) [@nickpang](https://community.cartalk.com/u/nickpang)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 8:38pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/11 "2012-02-11T20:38:43Z")

</div>

There’s no way the mobius strip answer would work. The belt would not rotate around leaving the twist in one spot between pulleys, but the tiwst would rotate with the belt and go over the pulleys, doing nothing to extend the life of the belt. Now if something could be engineered in to keep the twist point constant with relationship to the rest of the motor… But that’s not a 10 minute fix.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MBStever](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f04885/32.png) [@MBStever](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MBStever)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 8:44pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/12 "2012-02-11T20:44:44Z")

</div>

A flat belt in 1936?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mechaniker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/13edae/32.png) [@Mechaniker](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mechaniker)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2012, 10:54pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/13 "2012-02-11T22:54:41Z")

</div>

> **nickpang** — _"There's no way the mobius strip answer would work. The belt would not rotate around leaving the twist in one spot between pulleys, but the tiwst would rotate with the belt and go over the pulleys"_

And you know this how? Gut feel?

Twisted belts were often used on old farm equipment, either for reversing direction, to reduce effects of wind whip, or to increase friction.I have seen this at antique farm equipment shows. Google _tractor thresher twisted belt_ for some YouTube videos.

One fellow in Maine had a 6 hp gasoline engine attached by a flat belt to a table saw. (Apparently it was a short belt.) While applying belt dressing to the inside surface, a dangerous job, he wondered if he could turn the belt into a Mobius strip and apply belt dressing only to the upper surface. It is easy to do this by removing the belt lacing pin and giving the belt a half-turn before reinserting the pin…

Read his story [here](http://gasengine.farmcollector.com/Farm-Life/The-Mobius-Strip.aspx)

Either that guy is lying, or the twist does not “walk around” even a short belt as you claim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Charlie\_RT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecb155/32.png) [@Charlie\_RT](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Charlie_RT)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2012, 2:53am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/14 "2012-02-12T02:53:05Z")

</div>

What about the fact you are now turning the accessory backwards in the case of a water pump this would be boooogus

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![George\_San\_Jose1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e5b9ba/32.png) [@George\_San\_Jose1](https://community.cartalk.com/u/George_San_Jose1)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2012, 4:29am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/15 "2012-02-12T04:29:33Z")

</div>

The accessory gets turned backwards with a Mobius twist in the belt? I don’t think this is the case. Maybe a misunderstanding about the nature of the Mobius half-twist. The Mobius half-twist is in the belt itself, it’s not giving a regular (non-Mobius) belt a twisted (figure 8) belt-path. With the figure 8 belt path, the accessory would indeed get turned backwards. But not with a Mobius half-twist in the belt itself. Google “Mobius Strip”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2012, 4:34am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/16 "2012-02-12T04:34:17Z")

</div>

The mobious twist was all i could come up with,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Royroyroy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/5e9695/32.png) [@Royroyroy](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Royroyroy)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2012, 7:02pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/17 "2012-02-12T19:02:58Z")

</div>

I proposed a figure 8 solution and can’t understand why it wouldn’t work. I just verified it with 2 pencils and a flat rubber band. The belt would Be contacted on both sides and the pulleys are driven in the same direction. Can someone explain why they couldn’t manufacture the belt without making it a möbius and just twist it ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Royroyroy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/5e9695/32.png) [@Royroyroy](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Royroyroy)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2012, 9:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/18 "2012-02-12T21:26:58Z")

</div>

I should correct the last post. It was NOT a figure 8 that I proposed. Of course that would reverse the rotation of the pulleys. It was simply a half-twist of a straight belt, leaving one side in contact with the, say, top pulley, with the other side in contact with the bottom pulley. Any comments?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hybrid314](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/bb73d2/32.png) [@hybrid314](https://community.cartalk.com/u/hybrid314)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2012, 7:27am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/19 "2012-02-13T07:27:31Z")

</div>

@nickpang, the twist might move slightly over time but could never get beyond either of the pulleys so it would be a stable system. The odds are it would remain halfway between both pulleys since that is the position of least torsion and resistance.

@Mechaniker’s link mentions putting the twist on the slack side of the pulleys instead of the tension side, which makes sense. Either way, the twist could not move to the other side.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2012, 4:51am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847/20 "2012-02-14T04:51:49Z")

</div>

Gentlemen, Ladies, see the attached.  
[![](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AHW_Kammgarnspinnerei_Pfaffendorf_Leipzig_um_1925.jpg) ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AHW_Kammgarnspinnerei_Pfaffendorf_Leipzig_um_1925.jpg)

This was the norm intextile mills for a generation or more…much more. They were flat leather belts.

[Next page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/re-the-fan-belt-puzzler/70847.md?page=2)
