# GM Offers To Buy Back Volts From Worried Owners

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808>\
**Category:** Maintenance/Repairs\
**Tags:** chevrolet, volt\
**Created:** [December 3, 2011, 2:22am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808 "2011-12-03T02:22:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![littlemouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c4cdca/32.png) [@littlemouse](https://community.cartalk.com/u/littlemouse)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 4:16pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/21 "2011-12-06T16:16:43Z")

</div>

“People seem to have no issue driving around with 20 gallons of a highly flammable liquid sloshing around under the back seat. Why is an electrical fire cause for so much concern?”

Because it’s a fire. A gas tank is not a fire.

Typically the gas tank is not under the back seat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![common-sense-answer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/common-sense-answer/32/716_2.png) [@common-sense-answer](https://community.cartalk.com/u/common-sense-answer)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 5:32pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/22 "2011-12-06T17:32:11Z")

</div>

**_“Typically the gas tank is not under the back seat.”_**

If you’re lucky it is. Gas tanks that are installed “inboard” on vehicles are generally less likely to have gasoline fires in collisions. Gas tanks too near the rear bumper are dangerous. Think “Pinto.”

My Caravan’s gas tank is inboard under the center passengers’ seat. My Fieros have their gas tanks in the console between the front (only seats) seats. Old beetles and Corvairs had gas tanks in front of the driver.

Typically the gas tank is pretty darn close to being under the back seat or just behind that area. That’s generally a good thing.

CSA

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/48514_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 6:08pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/23 "2011-12-06T18:08:17Z")

</div>

CSA is correct!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![circuitsmith](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/circuitsmith/32/40376_2.png) [@circuitsmith](https://community.cartalk.com/u/circuitsmith)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 8:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/24 "2011-12-06T20:26:54Z")

</div>

Every FWD car I’ve dealt with had the gas tank nearly under the rear seat, unlike the old RWD sedans with the tank a few inches from the rear bumper and clearly visible to the driver behind them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whitey](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/whitey/32/24680_2.png) [@Whitey](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Whitey)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 8:34pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/25 "2011-12-06T20:34:15Z")

</div>

… also think 1960s Mustangs, which had the gas tank under the trunk. Early on the fuel tanks weren’t even secured, and in a rear end collision, gasoline would gush into the passenger compartment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![common-sense-answer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/common-sense-answer/32/716_2.png) [@common-sense-answer](https://community.cartalk.com/u/common-sense-answer)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 8:44pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/26 "2011-12-06T20:44:53Z")

</div>

**_Correct Me If I’m Wrong (I Was Wrong Once . . . I Thought I Was Wrong And Then Found Out That I Wasn’t).  
 😉_**

I remember helping a friend with an Escort (wagon ? sedan ?) and by lifting the rear seat cushion (and perhaps removing an inspection cover) I was able to come face to tank with the gas tank, fuel pump module, and fuel line connections, eh ?

My Bonneville has this same type access in the trunk floor, immediately behind the rear seat back.

CSA

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whitey](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/whitey/32/24680_2.png) [@Whitey](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Whitey)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 9:23pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/27 "2011-12-06T21:23:43Z")

</div>

My Civic has access to the fuel pump connections under the rear seat, so I assume the fuel tank is directly underneath it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Caddyman](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/caddyman/32/23_2.png) [@Caddyman](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Caddyman)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 9:27pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/28 "2011-12-06T21:27:52Z")

</div>

In those early Mustangs and Falcons, the top of the gas tank WAS the floor of the trunk! Mine developed some pin-hole rust spots and gasoline began leaking directly directly into the passenger compartment. The Fastbacks had fold-down rear seats which opened into the trunk which had a 1/2 inch of gasoline sloshing around in it…Death Traps…But today, people are willing to pay SERIOUS money for those poorly designed cars…

As far as I can find out, Chevy has not bought back a single Volt…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 11:49pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/29 "2011-12-06T23:49:00Z")

</div>

Toyota puts its gas tanks under the rear seat. I think all the FWD cars do now. I wonder where the Veyron’s gas tank is?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![common-sense-answer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/common-sense-answer/32/716_2.png) [@common-sense-answer](https://community.cartalk.com/u/common-sense-answer)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 12:08am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/30 "2011-12-07T00:08:34Z")

</div>

**_"I wonder where the Veyron’s gas tank is?"  
Besides The One That’s In The Car, I Imagine It’s On Just About Every Corner And I’m Guessing That One Would Have To Stop At Most Of Them.  
;=)_**  
CSA

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![common-sense-answer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/common-sense-answer/32/716_2.png) [@common-sense-answer](https://community.cartalk.com/u/common-sense-answer)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 12:18am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/31 "2011-12-07T00:18:38Z")

</div>

[http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=31619](http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=31619)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dagosa](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/dagosa/32/9837_2.png) [@dagosa](https://community.cartalk.com/u/dagosa)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 5:08am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/32 "2011-12-07T05:08:24Z")

</div>

Automotive companies think the same way they did years ago as far as safety items in cars is concerned. Making profits is paramount. Cars are safer because of access to knowledge and govt. regulations and it is harder for them to keep from getting their hand caught in the cookie jar. There is no benevolence on their part.

The better informed buying public is less apt to put up with unsafe cars which affects sales as the Pinto lesson demonstrates. It took time, research, testing and the light of day to expose Ford and GM back then while people died and they lied. Now, immediate public access like utube does it for you in short order. In that respect, automotive companies are smarter…they have Internet access too as profit is more closely tied to safer cars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffU](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@JeffU](https://community.cartalk.com/u/JeffU)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 5:47am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/33 "2011-12-07T05:47:47Z")

</div>

Volt owners really, really love their cars:

> **[Volt Owners: All You Need Is Love](https://www.cartalk.com/content/volt-owners-all-you-need-love)**
>
> The early-adopter owners of Chevy’s plug-in hybrid car are ecstatically happy, and the Volt fire reports don’t seem to be reducing their hot passions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BustedKnuckles](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bustedknuckles/32/25_2.png) [@BustedKnuckles](https://community.cartalk.com/u/BustedKnuckles)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 6:33am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/34 "2011-12-07T06:33:38Z")

</div>

Looks like GM is backing off the buy-back program : [http://www.ottawacitizen.com/cars/clarifies+Volt+buyback/5813959/story.html](http://www.ottawacitizen.com/cars/clarifies+Volt+buyback/5813959/story.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Triedaq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/65b543/32.png) [@Triedaq](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Triedaq)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 8:17pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/35 "2011-12-07T20:17:18Z")

</div>

"In those early Mustangs and Falcons, the top of the gas tank WAS the floor of the trunk! "  
My 1950 Chevy pickup had an even better gas tank arrangement. The tank was in the cab behind the seat. I think this was true for almost all pickup trucks of that time, though the Studebaker truck may have been an exception.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2011, 9:20pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/36 "2011-12-07T21:20:19Z")

</div>

Aikerson’s comment sounded pretty clear to me. It looks like there’s a whole lot of back-peddling going on. It sounds like he goofed in his comment.

Regarding gas tanks of old, heck I remember in the pre-Pinto days when cars had fill holes in clever hideaways, including under the rear license plate and behind the taillight trim. Fortunately, times have changed. For the good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2011, 10:27pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/37 "2011-12-08T22:27:21Z")

</div>

I read a lengthy article in yesterday’s USA Today that (I couldn’t find the internet link to it) that was very clear in saying that GM had, in fact, offered to buy back the Volts from concerned owners. They even went on to say how many they’d already retreived (very few) and to say that some of their executives wanted to buy the vehicles.

It seems like not everybody at GM is reading from the same script.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtsanders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@jtsanders](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jtsanders)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 7:28am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/38 "2011-12-09T07:28:15Z")

</div>

“It seems like not everybody at GM is reading from the same script.”

What big organization does have 100% knowledge of the party line?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Caddyman](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/caddyman/32/23_2.png) [@Caddyman](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Caddyman)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 7:55am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/39 "2011-12-09T07:55:29Z")

</div>

So have they actually bought anybody’s car back because the owners were “concerned”??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_same\_mountainbike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c89c15/32.png) [@the\_same\_mountainbike](https://community.cartalk.com/u/the_same_mountainbike)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2011, 7:03pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808/40 "2011-12-09T19:03:39Z")

</div>

According to the article in USA Today they have, but there were very few owners interested in the offer.

[Previous page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/gm-offers-to-buy-back-volts-from-worried-owners/69808.md?page=3)
