# Ford’s new Maverick

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Tags:** ford\
**Created:** [June 18, 2021, 1:34pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531 "2021-06-18T13:34:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Purebred](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/purebred/32/46796_2.png) [@Purebred](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Purebred)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 1:34pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/1 "2021-06-18T13:34:57Z")

</div>

The new Maverick pickup is on the Ford website.  
I think this might compete with the Ranger rather than attract new buyers from other brands other than the Hyundai.

If I didn’t need a tow vehicle, I would take the Ranger. But others would go with the hybrid Maverick.

Not a well worded post, but you get my drift.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rod-Knox](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a183cd/32.png) [@Rod-Knox](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Rod-Knox)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 1:40pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/2 "2021-06-18T13:40:14Z")

</div>

What does Ford see in the near future for the automobile market? Possibly higher fuel prices and increasing loan finance rates?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOLVO-V70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/8e8cbc/32.png) [@VOLVO-V70](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VOLVO-V70)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 1:55pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/3 "2021-06-18T13:55:13Z")

</div>

I guess there will never be a new pickup that is made that I want . I don’t need or want a 4 passenger truck. I don’t want one I have use a step ladder to wash the top . I want a 6 foot bed . I would even like it to be front wheel drive .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Purebred](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/purebred/32/46796_2.png) [@Purebred](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Purebred)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 2:36pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/4 "2021-06-18T14:36:31Z")

</div>

Both the Ranger and Colorado are available in two door extended cabs, though they have back seats, are better just for groceries.  
Ranger does say 6 foot box, Chevy only says “long box”.  
I agree, exteriors on full size pickups have grown too much. Wish I had my dad’s 46 Chevy!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![texases](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/texases/32/862_2.png) [@texases](https://community.cartalk.com/u/texases)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 2:44pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/5 "2021-06-18T14:44:41Z")

</div>

Here’s the Ranger with the 6’ bed. $27,000, but good luck finding one at a dealer:

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/original/3X/5/6/56f812bdeadf8ec0ad8ef14c4f3cf1a71dbea10f.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/30_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 3:14pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/6 "2021-06-18T15:14:07Z")

</div>

As per _Consumer Reports_:

The all-new 2022 Ford Maverick is the first-ever pickup truck to come standard as a hybrid. The base powertrain is a 191-hp, 2.5-liter hybrid four-cylinder linked to a continuously variable transmission and front-wheel drive.  
This combination is claimed to deliver 40 mpg in the city and allows a total range per tank of 500 miles, according to Ford. For more power, there is an available 250-hp, 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder with an eight-speed automatic and 4,000-pound tow capacity. It is available in front- and all-wheel drive. This small crewcab pickup has just a 4.5-foot bed. Three trims, plus an off-road package, allow this truck to span from thrifty, basic truck to a powerful, well-equipped model. The Maverick comes with FCW and AEB. BSW, rear cross traffic alert, and other systems are available.

BASE MSRP RANGE  
$19,995 - $29,880

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cavell](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/cavell/32/43396_2.png) [@Cavell](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Cavell)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 3:17pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/7 "2021-06-18T15:17:21Z")

</div>

Saw a scruffy ranger at store with a white haired lady smoking a long cig sitting in the handicap zone. Guess she wanted to finish it. Since we can’t smoke in stores.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtsanders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@jtsanders](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jtsanders)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 4:40pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/8 "2021-06-18T16:40:07Z")

</div>

Perfect for those weekend antique quests. Maybe not as a working truck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolyrobb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/wolyrobb/32/45497_2.png) [@wolyrobb](https://community.cartalk.com/u/wolyrobb)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 4:58pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/9 "2021-06-18T16:58:36Z")

</div>

The Ranger supercab will be the choice for those who want/need the bed space, the Maverick will probably do the job for many but before the market went nuts you could buy a base F150 with a hitch as the only option for about the same as a basic Ranger after discounts and rebates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mustangman](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/mustangman/32/44130_2.png) [@Mustangman](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Mustangman)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:03pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/10 "2021-06-18T21:03:26Z")

</div>

I think the Maverick is going to be a hit in the market. Plain and simple.

FWD, based on the Escape and Bronco Sport. Short bed but with a cool half-down tailgate feature that will support a 4x8 sheet of plywood. 2000lb tow for all versions, 4000 lbs with the tow package and the non-hybrid. AND a $20K price.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![texases](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/texases/32/862_2.png) [@texases](https://community.cartalk.com/u/texases)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:06pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/11 "2021-06-18T21:06:13Z")

</div>

Yep, Ford’s biggest problem with all their new trucks is making them fast enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:16pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/12 "2021-06-18T21:16:27Z")

</div>

Maybe I am jaundiced, never though the maverick was a great car and to re badge the name to a truck seems ridiculous to me. Lost in time I suppose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bscar2](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bscar2/32/2468_2.png) [@bscar2](https://community.cartalk.com/u/bscar2)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:17pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/13 "2021-06-18T21:17:45Z")

</div>

The Ranger is barely smaller than the F-150, which leaves me to wonder who the market is meant to be for. The new Jeep truck is what I would consider a small truck in today’s market. I’d give it a good considering if it weren’t for the pricing on it reaches full sized truck prices. I think the Maverick will fill the small truck niche just fine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:19pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/14 "2021-06-18T21:19:19Z")

</div>

My 93 Ranger was definitely not near an f150

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bscar2](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bscar2/32/2468_2.png) [@bscar2](https://community.cartalk.com/u/bscar2)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:20pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/15 "2021-06-18T21:20:19Z")

</div>

Sorry, I meant the new Ranger, not the older models.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Barkydog](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/barkydog/32/2470_2.png) [@Barkydog](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Barkydog)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:21pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/16 "2021-06-18T21:21:28Z")

</div>

Sorry 03 Ranger

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![texases](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/texases/32/862_2.png) [@texases](https://community.cartalk.com/u/texases)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/17 "2021-06-18T21:26:42Z")

</div>

> [@bscar2](#):
>
> The new Jeep truck is what I would consider a small truck in today’s market.

You might be surprised, it’s about 218" long, longer than a regular cab F150 (209"). The Maverick is 200", the Ranger 211".

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/30_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:26pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/18 "2021-06-18T21:26:47Z")

</div>

> [@Barkydog](#):
>
> Lost in time I suppose

More than likely, most of the folks who would buy the new Maverick truck have no memory of the earlier iteration of the Maverick name.  
🤔

When GM decided to market its new Chevy Citation in 1980, most likely very few people associated that model name with the ill-fated Edsel, which had previously used that model name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bscar2](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bscar2/32/2468_2.png) [@bscar2](https://community.cartalk.com/u/bscar2)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 9:48pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/19 "2021-06-18T21:48:08Z")

</div>

> [@texases](#):
>
> You might be surprised, it’s about 218" long, longer than a regular cab F150 (209"). The Maverick is 200", the Ranger 211".

You are correct. I thought it looked smaller in height compared to the F150, but the specs for both are very similar. Comparing the Jeep Renegade to the f-150, looking at their specs, they’re close to each other in sizes, it must just be my eyes that thought it was smaller than it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Renegade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Renegade](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Renegade)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:37pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531/20 "2021-06-18T22:37:38Z")

</div>

It’s not just you I had a maverick and in my opinion it fits the original definition of the word.

[Next page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ford-s-new-maverick/177531.md?page=2)
