Um, if the car is financed you MUST keep the car fully insured against theft and damage. If you don’t, the bank will cover it under their own umbrella policy and charge you for it which will be triple what you’d normally pay. All that is legally required is liability but banks are concerned about covering the loss of the asset if something happens. Did the OP say somewhere that money was still owed on it? OK, I see it " I am making car payments and dont really want to get insurance."
Not an option son, you must maintain insurance and registration on a car with a bank lien on it.
@Whitey
I hear you and agree that he would be selling it at a loss. But, the question is, how much of a loss and by how much does he owe more then the car is worth. IMHO, it is still acceptable to sell at some loss and it would take one heck of a loss to get me to make 18 months of payments on a car I could not use that would still depreciate in value. That is one heck of a difference. I would like OP to think long and hard on the economics. Cars are not investments and dumping money into them while not using them is treating them that way. I would have to see some real compelling math to agree to this idea ( keep paying on the car). Personally my good man, I would keep trying to sell the car, if I could determine an acceptable loss that would allow me to be soon dept free and at least save for a new car. I would like to know what he owes and his present payment schedule before I would accept storing it. What ever you determine the value, keep trying to sell the car !!!