# AT Fluid Suffix

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001>\
**Category:** Maintenance/Repairs\
**Created:** [August 21, 2013, 8:14pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001 "2013-08-21T20:14:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jmcarc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/278dde/32.png) [@jmcarc](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jmcarc)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2013, 8:14pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001/1 "2013-08-21T20:14:42Z")

</div>

The owner’s manual for my 1992 Buick Century tells me to use DEXRON 2E auto trans fluid. I found some old, unopened cans of Kendall AT fluid in my garage. I think they date back to when my wife had a 1974 Dodge. The cans are labeled DEXRON 2 without the “E” sufFix. Is it safe for me to use these old cans? Or, will I be asking for serious trouble? I know motor oils have a letter suffix, but how important is the suffix on trans fluid?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikeInNH](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a587f6/32.png) [@MikeInNH](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MikeInNH)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2013, 8:40pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001/2 "2013-08-21T20:40:36Z")

</div>

> Is it safe for me to use these old cans?

I wouldn’t risk it. It’s NOT worth risking the cost of destroying a transmission for the cost of a tranny fluid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BustedKnuckles](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bustedknuckles/32/25_2.png) [@BustedKnuckles](https://community.cartalk.com/u/BustedKnuckles)\
**Post date:** [August 21, 2013, 8:48pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001/3 "2013-08-21T20:48:18Z")

</div>

That old oil has got to be 20 years old! No way I’d put that in!

Dextron III superceded DextronIIE, and is fully compatible. Dextron VI is the new standard, and it is also compatible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tester](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/tester/32/15976_2.png) [@Tester](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Tester)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2013, 2:19am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001/4 "2013-08-22T02:19:47Z")

</div>

Dexron IIE solved the problem that Dexron IID had. And that was Dexron IID was hygroscopic. Or, the fluid absorbed moisture from out of the air. This wasn’t a problem if the fluid was used as a transmission fluid. But if were used in other hydraulic systems the fluid could absorb enough moisture to damage hydraulic components. So they came out with Dexron IIE.

If you use it as a transmission fluid there shouldn’t be a problem.

Tester

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BustedKnuckles](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/bustedknuckles/32/25_2.png) [@BustedKnuckles](https://community.cartalk.com/u/BustedKnuckles)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2013, 5:09am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/at-fluid-suffix/81001/5 "2013-08-22T05:09:21Z")

</div>

I just had a scary thought. You’re car is 20 years old. Has the original transmission fluid ever been changed?
