# Ask Someone: 2014 Honda CR-V - How was that engine?

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Tags:** honda\
**Created:** [October 5, 2018, 6:53pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238 "2018-10-05T18:53:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MathewChacko](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@MathewChacko](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MathewChacko)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 6:53pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/1 "2018-10-05T18:53:55Z")

</div>

hi honda crv 2.2 automatic engie perfomance

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Purebred](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/purebred/32/46796_2.png) [@Purebred](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Purebred)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 6:57pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/2 "2018-10-05T18:57:14Z")

</div>

Try Google, should be able to find performance tests.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorehamJ](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/gorehamj/32/24103_2.png) [@GorehamJ](https://community.cartalk.com/u/GorehamJ)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2018, 1:59pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/3 "2018-10-09T13:59:29Z")

</div>

Here’s a 2014 review of the CR-V from our partner, [BestRide](http://bestride.com/news/2014-honda-cr-v-awd-ex-l). The reviewer noted in his “Dislikes” that there was no up-powered engine offered.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Purebred](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/purebred/32/46796_2.png) [@Purebred](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Purebred)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2018, 3:43pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/4 "2018-10-09T15:43:23Z")

</div>

Reviewers say that some competitors offer stronger engines and are more fun to drive. However, test drivers say 2014 Honda CR-V’s secure handling, capable available all-wheel drive and adequate acceleration make it a smart choice for families.

Note the word “adequate”. I found one source stating 0-60 of 8.8 seconds,  
to me that is slow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VOLVO-V70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/8e8cbc/32.png) [@VOLVO-V70](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VOLVO-V70)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2018, 3:50pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/5 "2018-10-09T15:50:09Z")

</div>

I doubt if we will ever know what the person really wants to know . How fast the vehicle is - long term reliability - fuel usage . Does this person have one or is looking at purchasing a used one .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![George\_San\_Jose1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e5b9ba/32.png) [@George\_San\_Jose1](https://community.cartalk.com/u/George_San_Jose1)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2018, 3:17am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/6 "2018-10-10T03:17:51Z")

</div>

> [@Purebred](#):
>
> 0-60 of 8.8 seconds,  
> to me that is slow.

Definitely not muscle or racing car specs, but 8.8 seconds is pretty good performance for a 4 door family vehicle. Nothing shoddy about that spec at all. I found a spec for the engine too, 185 HP. Again, pretty good for a family vehicle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PvtPublic](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/pvtpublic/32/13089_2.png) [@PvtPublic](https://community.cartalk.com/u/PvtPublic)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2018, 9:02am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/7 "2018-10-10T09:02:13Z")

</div>

> [@Purebred](#):
>
> Note the word “adequate”. I found one source stating 0-60 of 8.8 seconds,  
> to me that is slow.

I must be getting old. I remember when that was considered greased lightning.😀

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Purebred](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/purebred/32/46796_2.png) [@Purebred](https://community.cartalk.com/u/Purebred)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2018, 9:08am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/8 "2018-10-10T09:08:50Z")

</div>

Oh, me too, In the 60s that would be quick. But not by today’s standards.  
The OP specifically stated “performance”. Depending on where you live and driving conditionns this might be more than adequate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shanonia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9de053/32.png) [@shanonia](https://community.cartalk.com/u/shanonia)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2018, 6:03pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/ask-someone-2014-honda-cr-v-how-was-that-engine/126238/9 "2018-10-10T18:03:18Z")

</div>

For reliability, much better than average according to Consumer Reports survey data.
