# 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT

**URL:** <https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [July 4, 2014, 2:18am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788 "2014-07-04T02:18:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jtsanders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c2a13f/32.png) [@jtsanders](https://community.cartalk.com/u/jtsanders)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2014, 5:52am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788/41 "2014-07-17T05:52:50Z")

</div>

Sixty.grand is an attractive price. But it will likely get bid up since they will be rationed among the dealerships.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![texases](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/texases/32/862_2.png) [@texases](https://community.cartalk.com/u/texases)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2014, 6:07am UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788/42 "2014-07-17T06:07:10Z")

</div>

You’re right, I bet $10-15k added, or more for the first ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarkM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de053/32.png) [@MarkM](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MarkM)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2014, 1:52pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788/43 "2014-07-17T13:52:17Z")

</div>

I’m sure they’ve done their research on the right price, which, in cars like this has little to do with costs. 60k is too much for people just wanting a little extra vim. Not for me. Not my style and not very practical in San Francisco.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VDCdriver](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/cartalk/user_avatar/community.cartalk.com/vdcdriver/32/30_2.png) [@VDCdriver](https://community.cartalk.com/u/VDCdriver)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2014, 3:04pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788/44 "2014-07-17T15:04:13Z")

</div>

This would have to be one of the last cars that I would consider buying, but…if it _floats somebody’s boat_ and if they can pay the inflated price, then…more power to them (both literally and figuratively).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarkM](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de053/32.png) [@MarkM](https://community.cartalk.com/u/MarkM)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2014, 1:34pm UTC](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788/45 "2014-07-20T13:34:31Z")

</div>

I don’t think it has been a major sales success, unlike the retro-Mustangs and Camaros , despite having styling more faithful to the original. It’s just too big and heavy. The current Charger is just as attractive as the Challenger and a good deal more practical. And can be configured to be plenty quick (and thirsty.)

[Previous page](https://community.cartalk.com/t/2015-dodge-challenger-srt/85788.md?page=2)