Join the Car Talk Community!

Discussion Rules

Welcome to the Car Talk Community!

Want to ask a question or join the discussion? Great! Join now.

Sign In Register

Timing Belt Change?

My local Honda dealer told me that my 1998 Honda Accord, 78,000 miles, is due for a timing belt change. However the owners manual recommends a 105,000-mile change, but also recommends a 84-month change. The car runs well. No problems, yet. I put on less than 10,000 miles a year. Is the age of the belt, currently about 108 months, as important of a variable as is the mileage? Or would it be reasonable to wait for the 105,000-mile marker?
«134

Comments

  • edited June 2007
    Your dealer is not trying for ADP (Additional Dealer Profit) he is trying to keep you from, at best, stuck somewhere with a non-functioning engine, or maybe in a serious accident (when the belt breaks the engine stops RIGHT NOW.) or serious engine damage. Get it done at once.
  • edited June 2007
    Wow! Sounds like this is real important. I'll wait one more day, before I call for an appointment, to see if anyone else has a thought about this. Thank you for your immediate response!
  • edited June 2007
    Your Honda will run well until the belt breaks, and then the engine will be toast. I knew somebody with a Prelude whose timing belt broke at 87k while waiting to get into work. Since the dealer had told her to wait till the car had 90k before changing the belt, they stepped up and paid for all the engine repairs which were considerable. The car was only 4 or 5 years old at the time. Age is just as important as miles for a timing belt. I think the dealer is actually doing you a service in this case.

    Ed B.
  • edited June 2007
    Honda makes interference engine. This means when the timing belt breaks, the valve & piston will hit each other & this means big damages=big bucks to fix. I don't buy cars with timing belts. Instead, I buy cars with timing chains (peace of mind & money save).
  • edited June 2007

    As the others have already stated, this is vital if you want to avoid MAJOR (think in terms of a couple of thousand $$) engine damage.

    That being said, I wonder why someone would doubt the manufacturer's recommendation for timing belt replacement based on elapsed time--or any other scheduled maintenance items based on elapsed time. Honda would like you to buy another vehicle from them, but if you have a very negative experience with the longevity of the car (like what would result from a snapped timing belt), you would be unlikely to buy another Honda. As a result, it is always prudent to believe and to follow the manufacturer's maintenance recommendations carefully. This leads me to wonder if skepticism has led the OP to ignore other elapsed time recommendations for maintenance.

    Ignoring a dealership's maintenance recommendations is frequently a good thing. Ignoring the vehicle manufacturer's maintenance recommendations is foolhardy and is sure to lead to more expense in the long run.
  • edited June 2007
    I believe there are cars with timing chains which have interference engines. my 89 Sentra did.
  • edited June 2007
    The book for my accord says 105,000 miles, and two trusted mechanics I checked with (who could have lied to make a quick buck) told me there was no need until 105,000 miles, like the book says. One of them told me he typically changes Accord belts between 105,000 and 115,000 miles, and none of his customers has had a disaster. BTW my Accord is the same "generation" as yours, though a different year (2001).

    Russ
  • edited June 2007
    Read the manual better, your missing the months portion. Time ages rubber as does mileage.

    Mechanics know very little about materials science, just their observations. The engineers of your vehicle and the parts suppliers engineers have a deep understanding of the parts and their lifespan.
  • edited June 2007
    Read the manual better, your missing the months portion. Time ages rubber as does mileage.

    Mechanics know very little about materials science, just their observations. The engineers of your vehicle and the parts suppliers engineers have a deep understanding of the parts and their lifespan.

    I disagree with this statement. I like many quality mechanics understand a lot about the longevity of compounds used in automobiles. We know rubber degrades over time. This Honda dealership obviously is aware of it as well thats hy they informed the OP of the need for a change. It is the ignorance of the driver that cause most of the problems.
  • edited June 2007
    The car runs well. No problems, yet.
    How well the engine runs is no indicator of if the timing belt is bad or not. It either works or doesn't (i.e. broke). This is a interference engine. If the belt breaks it CAN destroy the engine. Get it fixed.

    BTW...You don't have to take it to the dealer. Find a good local mechanic to do it. Usually a LOT cheaper. Also have the water pump replaced at the same time.
This discussion has been closed.