Join the Car Talk Community!

Discussion Rules

Welcome to the Car Talk Community!

Want to ask a question or join the discussion? Great! Join now.

Sign In Register

Timing Belt 2004 Honda Accord 6 Cyl

My 2004 Accord has 99,000 miles. Do I need to change timing belt and water pump? Any idea what this repair will cost?
«1

Comments

  • edited January 2011
    Going on 7 years old now.
    Owner's manual will tell you to change it at XX months or XX miles, whichever comes first. Call around to various shops and have them give you an estimate for it, and make sure it's for the same work as well. Some shops might just replace the belt and pump and reuse other items, whereas other shops will change the belt, pump, pulleys and other things while they're in there.
  • edited January 2011
    This webtool will give you a good estimate of the cost for your area:

    http://repairpal.com/

    I suggest having the water pump changed at the same time. The timing belt runs the water pump, so if the water pump freezes up it can break the timing belt, which results in your engine being ruined (pistons hit the valves and bend them).
  • edited January 2011
    As others have said, read your manual and find out what the replacement interval is.

    I had the timing belt and water pump replaced on my wife's 2003 Odyssey last year for about $500. This was at an independent shop; Honda quoted me $650.

    Go on and have the work done. I know it's expensive, and you think you can keep putting off spending the cash. However, before you know it, when you least expect it, the belt will snap and you'll be in a world of hurt.

    Good luck.
  • edited January 2011
    Yes, you need to have the timing belt replaced. If it breaks the engine will be damaged internally.

    Call a couple of mechanics and get estimates.
  • edited January 2011
    This isn't a repair. It is maintenance. Do call around for estimates, but whatever it costs, its much cheaper than the alternative.
  • edited January 2011
    At One Time I Considered It Maintenance. Now I'm Done Buying Any Car With A Timing Belt. I Consider It A Repair Because The Manufacturer Has Made A Vehicle With A Known Flaw, Just Like Specific Vehicles With Frames That Rust Out Prematurely.

    CSA
  • edited January 2011
    Your owner's manual probably says to change it at 105,000 miles.
  • edited January 2011
    The manufacturer has made a vehicle with a known flaw? What is the flaw? Belts are wear and tear items. That's like saying knowing that brake pads wear is producing a vehicle with a known flaw. Many engines were designed with timing belts and no one has ever hidden the fact that it is a belt and has to be serviced at specified intervals.

    Now, on the general point. I am with you. I'd rather never own anything with a timing belt (though it can be hard to avoid if you want smaller, 4cyl cars) - but they are a design decision not a flaw.
  • edited January 2011

    By the same logic....Manufacturers who use timing chains make the vehicle with a known flaw...Timing chains wear out and stretch...On a interference engine when the timing chain stretches and jumps a tooth....SEVERE ENGINE DAMAGE WILL OCCUR...The cost to replace a chain in MOST vehicles that have a chain..is easily 3-5 times what a the replacement cost of a timing belt is. ....Talk about a flaw!!!!
  • edited January 2011
    I concur with common sense. With the exception of their v6 engines Honda has joined the modern world with all 4cylinder motors using a timing chain. Many other makers have followed suit.

    I am looking at a $300-$500 timing belt "repair" on my wife's 2005 Legacy in the next 2000 miles.
This discussion has been closed.